The title might be shocking, but it’s nonetheless true. Yesterday, Katherine Sebelius (Obama’s Department of Health and Human Services appointee) issued a new regulation requiring all insurance plans to cover birth control by January 1, 2013 as a “preventative health measure.” Sebelius’s announcement proclaims, “These historic guidelines are based on science and existing (medical) literature and will help ensure women get the preventive health benefits they need.” Preventive health? If I were less scrupulous, I might conclude that the Obama administration is defining pregnancy as a disease and that Katherine Sebelius hates children, lending a whole new meaning to her “cost control” rhetoric. Of course, birth control is only one item among a host of female health needs that must now be covered without a co-pay, so that conclusion would not seem appropriate.
It is typical of liberals to try and hide the true issue whenever discussing policies like this. The Obama administration is highlighting how the new policy will meet the health needs of women, while ignoring that 80% of insurance plans already cover birth control with co-pays of between $5 – 15 a month. The real issue here is whether women should have to follow normal insurance procedures to pay for birth control. Their current co-pays are well below the $15 – $30 average range for insurance co-pays that Americans pay every day for blood pressure medication, drugs to treat renal failure, and everything in between. So why should woman’s health be elevated above all other health needs? I’ll leave that for the reader to decide.
The net effect of this regulation is that premiums will increase, on everyone, regardless of whether you use birth control. The quarter of the nation that is Catholic is even morally opposed to contraceptive, which they will now be inadvertently subsidizing via higher insurance premiums. And that’s the question Katherine Sebelius never addresses: why should some Americans pay for the birth control of others? But in typical liberal fashion, if Republicans ever try to raise this as an issue, it will indicate that we are anti-women, that we like stone age policies which ban all contraceptives, and probably that we are both male chauvinists and racists. These things are all categorically false, distractions from the fact that liberal social engineers are doing their best to destroy America’s social mores and family values by subsidizing sex. Republicans are not against birth control, we are for individual responsibility and the idea that if you want birth control, you should have to pay for it independent of government manipulation. As it stands, people who don’t purchase birth control, for moral or practical reasons, will be funding the sexual behavior of those people who do purchase it. Or as I like to call it: Obama helping the little man.
Like this:
One blogger likes this post.